From: A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements
Device | Company | Parameter | Intra-rater Reliability | Inter-rater reliability | Correlation with clinical score | Cost | Portability | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eykona 3D camera | Fuel 3D | Surface area and volume | Intra-operator variability: area: 0.9 %; volume: 4.0 % | Intra-operator variability: area: 1.7 %; volume: 4.0 % | No data | <£5000 for the camera unit. | Yes | Paterson et al. (Eykona Medical Imaging FAQ) [86]. |
~£3 for each disposable target but device can now be configured to use reusable targets. | ||||||||
Lifeviz I, II, Micro | Quantificare | Surface area and volume | No data | Surface area: ICC = 0.99 (Coefficient of variation 5.9–6.8 %) | Surface area: Excellent level of agreement with Visitrak (ICC 0.96, 95 % CI 0.93, 0.97); however greater level of variability in larger wounds especially circumferential wounds. Volume: r 2 = 0.9678 when correlated with actual volumes of model scars | £10,000–£15,000 | Yes | |
Volume: no data | ||||||||
Vectra H1 | Canfield Imaging Systems Inc. | Surface area and volume | No data | No data | No data | £10,000–£15,000 | Yes | |
Artec Eva | Artec | Surface area and volume | No data | No data | No data | <£10,000 (depends on package) | Yes | N/a |
Minolta Vivid 910 3D linear laser scanner | Konica-Minolta | Surface area and volume | No data | No data | No data | >£15,000 | Yes | Taylor et al. 2007 [93]. |
Moulding (positive–negative moulage) | N/a | Volume | ICC = 0.921–0.995 | ICC = 0.759–0.977 | No data | Dependent on moulding material and measurement techniques used | Yes | Berman et al. 2015 [72]. |