Open Access

Early childhood severe scalds in a developing country: A 3-year retrospective study

Burns & Trauma20131:10030122

DOI: 10.4103/2321-3868.123073

Published: 18 December 2013

Abstract

The burns intensive care unit (BICU) staff observed an increasing number of pediatric scald burn admissions as a result of increase injuries associated with the scald burns. A retrospective study was conducted to identify scalds demographics, etiologies, and mortality risk factors. This descriptive study comprised a total of 166 patients aged 0-5 years, who were admitted to the BICU of the Reconstructive Plastic Surgery and Burns Unit (RPSBU) through the Accident and Emergency (A and E) Centre of the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH)from May 1st 2009 to April 30th 2012. Source of information was the BICU Computerized Database System. Data extracted included demographics as well as treatment methods and outcomes. The study population was 166; 92 (55.4%) males and 74 (44.6%) females. Scalds admissions were 141 (84.9%); 13 (9.2%) of them died, 83 (58.9%) discharged, and 45 (31.9%) transferred-out to another burn ward and pediatric surgery ward in the hospital. Scald patients’ demographics included 78 males (55.3%) and 63 females (44.7%); mean age was 2.18 years. Mortality risk factors identified were age <3 years (P = 0.044); scalds from hot water (P = 0.033), total burns surface area >30% (P = 0.017), and multiple body parts affected (P = 0.049). The current study showed age, hot water, and Total Burns Surface Area (TBSA) as risk factors of early childhood scalds. Education on scalds prevention targeting mothers/caregivers is needed to create awareness of the frequency, severity, and danger associated with pediatric scalds.

Key words

Scalds risk factor education early childhood outcome prevention

Introduction

Globally, scalds are the most commonly treated burns that generally result in less severe injuries and rarely require a lengthy hospital stay[1,17] Scalds may be superficial, deep, or a combination of both. Among children under 6 years, falls, poisoning, cuts, burns, smoke inhalation, drowning, suffocation, and choking cause at least two-thirds of all unintentional injuries. Many of these injuries occur in the home where young children spend most of their time;[18] thus they are often scalds.

Access this article online

Quick Response Code:

Website: www.burnstrauma.com

DOI: 10.4103/2321-3868.123073

Burns from hot drinks, food, steam, or other hot liquids (all referred to as ‘scalds’) are common causes of serious injuries to young children. According to the booklet, “A Child Safe Home for Under Fives: preventing injuries to young children”,[19] especially under-fives are naturally curious and are often attracted by the steam from hot water or drinks. They may not recognize the danger of getting burnt until it is too late. While there are enormous variations in the age of patients with burn injuries, global studies demonstrate that the 0–5 year age group had the highest incidence.[13,79,16,2025] The high incidence of burn injuries in this age group is attributable to children’s impulsiveness, lack of awareness, higher activity levels, natural curiosity, and total dependency on their caregivers.[2628] In toddlers, the upper part of the body including the anterior trunk is the most frequently burned area.[1,26,29] Burns of the upper body are associated with the natural curiosity of the 0–5 year age group exploring their surroundings through pulling, touching, and grabbing objects.[1] Burns mortality factors such as gender, age, comorbid disease, inhalation injury, co-existing trauma, and pneumonia have been identified and reported.[30,31] This study seeks to identify early severe scalds demographics, etiologies, and mortality risk factors in children aged 0–5 years.

Materials and methods

Study setting

The Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) in Kumasi is the second largest hospital in Ghana and the only tertiary health institution in the middle belt of the country. It is the main referral hospital for the Ashanti, Brong Ahafo (BA), northern, upper east, and upper west regions. Statistical records from KATH show that about two-thirds of the patients are from the Ashanti Region, with BA and the three Northern regions sharing the remaining in a two to one ratio. The hospital was built in 1954 as the Kumasi Central Hospital. It was later named Komfo Anokye Hospital after Okomfo Anokye, a legendary fetish priest of the Ashantis. It was converted into a teaching hospital in 1975, affiliated to the School of Medical Sciences of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) in Kumasi. The hospital currently has 1,000 beds, up from the initial 500 when first built. Annually, the hospital attends to about 679,050 patients made up of both out- and inpatients (KATH Biostatistics Unit, 2012).

In order to assess the causes and magnitude of scalds children 0–5 years of age with scalds wounds that were admitted to KATH burns intensive care unit (BICU) were eligible for the study. Consent was sought and obtained from the parents/guardians/caretakers of the affected children whose data was used in the study.

Ethical clearance

Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from the KNUST School of Medical Sciences/KATH Committee on Human Research, Publication and Ethics, Kumasi.

Data collection

Data on the patients were collected from May 1st 2009 to April 30th 2012 from the Computerized Database System at the BICU of the Reconstructive Plastic Surgery and Burns Unit (RPSBU). Data retrieved for the study included: Admissions, demographics, extent of burns, etiology of burns, length of hospital stay, and mortality.

Data analysis

The quantitative data was presented using descriptive statistics, summarized, and displayed on graphs and charts. Data entry and analysis was made using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Patient management

Burn injuries in all age groups were admitted first into the Accident and Emergency (A and E) Centre following the triage process and subsequent initial admissions to its various sections: First Aid Unit — Yellow Section; Minor Treatment Unit — Orange Section, and Major Treatment Unit —Red Section were done according to the burn injury severity as prescribed in the KATH A and E Centre Burn Protocol.[32] This same Protocol was strictly followed for the admissions and immediate treatment/resuscitation. Similarly, further management procedures were done according to the same Protocol.

Limitations of the study

This study does not cover all the scald injuries in KATH since some of them, being minor, were treated on outpatient basis, hence their records were not captured in the BICU.

Results

Sex distribution

Scald burn patients’ demographics included males 78 (55.3%) and females 63 (44.7%) with a mean age of 2.18 years [Figure 1].

Figure 1:

Sex distribution of scalds in age group 0–5 years (n = 141).

Etiology of burns

The mean total body surface area (TBSA) was 19.7% with mean length of BICU admission of 6.03 days. The remaining pediatric burns admissions (N = 166 – 141 = 25) for children aged 0–5 were caused by open fire or flame (21, 12.7%), gas explosion (2, 1.2%), and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (2, 1.2%) [Figure 2].

Figure 2:

Etiology of burns in age group 0–5 years (n = 166).

Etiology of scalds

The etiological agents for the scald burns included: Hot water (96, 68.1%)—the commonest, hot soup (22, 15.6%), hot tea or porridge (6, 4.3%), hot oil (13, 9.2%), hot stew (1, 0.7%), and hot stock (3, 2.1%) [Figures 3, 5, 6 and 7].

Figure 3:

Etiology of scalds (n = 141).

Figure 5:

Early childhood severe scald caused by hot soup.

Figure 6:

Early childhood severe scald caused by hot tea.

Figure 7:

Early childhood severe scald caused by porridge.

Outcome of scalds

Out of the 141 scald burns there were 13 (9.2%) deaths, 83 (58.9%) discharges, and 45 (31.9%) transferred-outs to other burn wards in the hospital (General Burns Ward and Pediatric Surgical Ward) [Figure 4].

Figure 4:

Outcome of scalds (n = 141).

Risk factors that influenced burn mortality in the study

Multiple regression analysis was used to determine sociodemographic features which are mortality predisposing factors influencing pediatric burns in the study center. Using the “outcome of admission, that is, death” as the dependent factors, all the demographic features of the participants were involved in the analysis. A probability value (P-value) of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant at 95% confidence interval [Table 1].

Table 1:

Pediatric burns mortality risk factors in the study

 

Unstandardized coefficients

Standardized coefficients

 

Model

B

Standard error

Beta

t

Significance (P-value)

Age (<3 years)

0.097

0.022

0.620

1.235

0.044**

Sex

0.140

0.064

0.301

1.064

0.063

Duration

−0.032

0.038

−0.364

2.347

0.451

Etiology (hot water)

−0.056

0.011

−0.244

1.082

0.033**

TBSA (>30%)

−0.077

0.063

−0.295

−2.111

0.017**

Inhalation injury

0.084

0.037

−0.187

1.065

0.074

Body part affected (multiple parts)

0.107

0.143

2.034

0.710

0.049*

**Denotes significant value (P< 0.05.TBSA = Total body surface area

Thus in this current study, children less than 3 years, hot water, TBSA greater than 30%, and multiple body parts affected were identified as mortality risk factors of scalds in children aged 0–5 years.

Discussion

The psychological stress burns patients go through could have crippling effects on them such as causing them to be nonfunctional and thereby affecting their quality of life.[33] Due to the curious nature of infants and toddlers and the urge to mostly pull and push things around, they end up getting injured when containers, pots, or pans containing hot fluids overturn and pour on them.[6] Most parents especially mothers and caregivers usually have a tough time handling children during this stage of their developments.

Infection following burn injuries is possible especially in children if not properly handled. Children who suffer from burns in general need special care and attention to help hasten the healing process as well as to minimize scarring. Scarring from scald injury could affect the individual psychologically.[33] From the current study, out of the 141 children who suffered scalds, there were 13 deaths (mortality = 9.2%), 83 discharges, and 45 transferred-outs to other burn wards. Outcome of scalds being death could be attributed in delay of taking the victim to the hospital or a specialized center where they can be properly taken care of; no death was recorded out of the patients transferred out or discharged. In their study on the characteristics of burns in children under 7 years of age, Balseven-Odabasi reported that 69% of burn injured children were less than 3-years-old and that scalds accounted for over 60% of pediatric burns while the mortality rate was 4%.[1] If victims are well taken care of some complications could be avoided. Scald injury could be extensive, affecting larger body surface area with deeper tissue injury than thermal burns resulting in hospitalization and transfer as occurred in about 25% of patients, whereas as high as 99.9% of thermal burns patients were treated and discharged.[6]

According to Cronin et at., the majority of parents become aware of that these accidents are preventable after they had occurred.[34] Due to the fact that cognition in children is not as high as in adult, during their moving about physically, they are unaware of the associated risks involved hence increasing their ability of encountering hot fluids, thus as their motor skill development exceeds their cognitive development. Results from this study showed most of the scald injuries occurred in the kitchen (85%). Similar findings were reported by Serour et al.,[35] and Schricke et at.,[36] in their studies stating that scald injuries occurring in the homes were 85.7 and 90.8%, respectively and therefore in the homes, children or toddlers should not be allowed in the kitchen area unattended to.[36]

Even though strides have been made in developed countries to aid in the prevention of burns, the situation is however different in developing countries and low middle income countries. In the current study, the major factor that accounted for increased early childhood scalds admission was lack of supervision by mothers and caregivers. Caregivers and parents should be offered training to properly take care of their children. Public education at all levels on burns should be encouraged. The elderly should keep kids under very close supervision or surveillance. Behaviors in the home can also result in increased scald occurrence such as placing hot drinks at places where toddlers can easily have access to can increase the risk.

A study by Serour et al., also showed that males (69.2%) outnumbered females (30.8%) in their 5-year study period on 266 children who were hospitalized for thermal burn injury.[35] Our current study also shows that males (55.3%) suffered more from scalds than females (44.7%). In the current study, hot water (68.1%) was the major etiology of scalds; this finding is similar to the study by Balseven-Odabasi et al., where they reported hot water (81.7%) as the major cause of scald injury.[1] However, in a retrospective study carried out by Yates et al., hot beverage accounted for 65% of all scalds, followed by hot water (16%), and then hot foods such as soup and sauces (10%).[32] Hot water was the scald agent in 48.5% cases reported by Drago in her study where she also revealed that scalds contributed 65.7% of burns treated injury during a 6-year period of 17,237 emergency department treated burns in children 5 years and younger.[6]

In this study, scalds (84.9%) were the major etiology of burns which was similar to what Balseven-Odabasi et al., reported that scalds accounted for 82% of all injuries in their study.[1] Also, Serour et al., reported in their study that scalds (74.4%) was the most common etiology of burns in their study[35] and similarly, Schricke et al., reported that scald injury contributed 56.0% of all pediatric burns admissions in their study.[35] Increase in hospital stay results in high economic burden for families due to extra time and cost for persons managing victims of scalds and burns leading to economic loss and morbidity.[37,38]

Agbenorku et al., in their study identified the following as some of the pediatric burns mortality risk factors: Persons below the age of 6 years; hot water or soup; and total burn surface area greater than 36%.[39] Similarly, in this current study; children less than 3 years, hot water, TBSA greater than 30%, and multiple body parts affected were identified as mortality risk factors of scalds in children aged 0–5 years.

Burns in general, irrespective of the etiology poses some socioeconomic burdens on the victims as well as caregivers resulting in morbidity and nonproductivity.[37,38] In general, infants and toddlers depend solely on their mothers and caregivers for care and support they need, implying that caregivers have to invest time which could otherwise be used to work to take care of their kids hence causing economic burden. This current study has as high as 84.9% being scald injuries and so burns preventive measures, especially towards scald prevention at homes should be paramount since the home serves as the highest place of childhood scalds occurrence.[33] Public education on scald injury prevention should be encouraged at all levels especially in schools where young children and their mothers/caregivers are likely to benefit from and also training programs on infant care and management should be promoted so that children are better taken care of always especially at homes to prevent occurrences of unfortunate incidences.[40]

Conclusion

Age less than 3 years, scalds from hot water, TBSA greater than 30%, and multiple body parts affected were early childhood scalds mortality risk factors identified. Since scald injuries in children are very common, mothers and caregivers should always place precautionary measures when handling their infants and toddlers. Public education on safety and burns prevention should be encouraged at all levels. Mothers and caregivers should ensure children are not allowed unattended to in kitchen areas or places where they could be exposed to danger. In situations where burns occur, caregivers should take the necessary action by taking the child to a health facility so that the child gets care and appropriate treatment to avoid fatalities.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The author sincerely thanks Dr. Paul Saunderson for his useful comments on this paper; also thanking Miss Elizabeth Anthony for the accurate data collection which formed the basis of this work.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Reconstructive Plastic Surgery and Burns Unit, Department of Surgery, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, School of Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
(2)
Reconstructive Plastic Surgery and Burns Unit, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, School of Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology

References

  1. Balseven-Odabasi A, Tümer AR, Keten A, Yorganci K. Burn injuries among children aged up to seven years. Turk J Pediatr 2009;51:328–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Akita S, Nakagawa H, Tanaka K, Hirano A. Analysis of pediatric burns in Nagasaki University from 1983 to 2002. Burns 2005;31:1041–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Akerlund E, Huss FR, Sjoberg F. Burns in Sweden: An analysis of 24,538 cases during the period 1987–2004. Burns 2007;33:31–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Celko AM, Grivna M, Dánová J, Barss P. Severe childhood burns in the Czech Republic: Risk factors and prevention. Bull World Health Organ 2009;87:374–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bessey PQ, Arons R, DiMaggio CJ, Yurt RW. The vulnerabilities of age: Burns in children and older adults. Surgery 2006;140:705–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Drago DA. Kitchen scalds and thermal burns in children five years and younger. Pediatrics 2005;115:10–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kumar P, Chirayil PT, Chittoria R. Ten year’s epidemiological study of paediatric burns in Manipal, India. Burns 2000;26:261–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lin TM, Wang KH, Lai CS, Lin SD. Epidemiology of pediatric burns in southern Taiwan. Burns 2005;31:182–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Morrow SE, Smith DL, Cairns BA, Howell PD, Nakayama DK, Peterson HD. Etiology and outcome of pediatric burns. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:329–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mukerji G, Chamania S, Patidar GP, Gupta S. Epidemiology of paediatric burns in Indore, India. Burns 2001;27:33–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sharma PN, Bang RL, Al-Fadhli AN, Sharma P, Bang S, Ghoneim IE. Paediatric burns in Kuwait: Incidence, causes and mortality. Burns 2006;32:104–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Soueid A, King H, Wilson YT Paediatric burns caused by other children. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:540–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sprinks A, Wasiak J, Cleland H, Beben N, Macpherson AK. Ten-year epidemiological study of pediatric burns in Canada. J Burn Care Res 2008;29:482–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Torabian S, Sadegh SM. Epidemiology of paediatric burns injuries in Hamadan, Iran. Burns 2009;35:1147–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wasiak J, Spinks A, Ashby K, Clapperton A, Cleland H, Gabbe B. The epidemiology of burns injuries in an Australian setting, 2000–2006. Burns 2009;35:1124–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Xin W Yin Z, Qin Z, Jian L, Tanuseputro P, Gomez M, et al. Characteristics of 1494 pediatric burn patients in Shanghai. Burns 2006;32:613–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Vendrusculo TM, Balieiro CR, Echevarría-Guanilo ME, Farina Junior JA, Rossi LA. Burns in the domestic environment: Characteristics and circumstances of accidents. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2010;18:444–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. DiGuiseppi C, Roberts IG Individual-level injury prevention strategies in the clinical setting. Future Child 2000;10(1) :53–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Accident Compensation Corporation. A Child Safe Home for Under Fives: Preventing Injuries to Young Children. Wellington: Accident Compensation Corporation; 2001. [Accessed in August, 2013]Google Scholar
  20. Forjuoh SN. Burns in low-and middle-income countries: A review of available literature on descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and prevention. Burns 2006;32:529–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lowell G, QuinlanK, Gottlieb LJ. Preventing unintentional scald burns: Movingbeyond tap water. Pediatrics 2008;122:799–804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mashreky SR, Rahman A, Chowdhury SM, Giashuddin S, Svanstrom L, Linnan M, et al. Epidemiology of childhood burn: Yield of largest community-based injury survey in Bangladesh. Burns 2008;34:856–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Natterer J, de Buys Roessingh A, Reinberg O, Hohlfeld J. Targeting burn prevention in the paediatric population: A prospective study of children’s burns in the Lausanne area. Swiss Med Wkly 2009;139:535–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Medical Research Council/UNISA. A profile of fatal injuries in South Africa 2007. 9th Annual Report of the National Injury Mortality Surveillance System. Crime, Violence and Injury Lead Programme; 2008. [Accessed in August 2013].
  25. Dissanaike S, Boshart K, Coleman A, Wishnew J, Hester C. Cooking-related pediatric burns: Risk factors and the role of differential cooling rates among commonly implicated substances. J Burn Care Res 2009;30:593–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dissanaike S, Rahimi M. Epidemiology of burn injuries: Highlighting cultural and socio-demographic aspects. Int Rev Psychiatry 2009;21:505–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Forjuoh SN. Burns in low- and middle-income countries: A review of available literature on descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, treatment and prevention. Burns 2006;32:529–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith DL, Cairns BA, Ramadan F, Dalston JS, Fakhry SM, Rutledge R, et al. Effect of inhalation injury, burn size, and age on mortality: A study of 1447 consecutive burn patients. J Trauma 1994;37:655–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McGwin GJr, George RL, Cross JM, Rue LW Improving the ability to predict mortality among burn patients. Burns 2008;34:320–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Agran PF, Anderson C, Winn D, Trent R, Walton-Haynes L, Thayer S. Rates of pediatric injuries by 3-month intervals for children 0 to 3 years of age. Pediatrics 2003;111:e683–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Albertyn R, Bickler SW, Rode H. Paediatric burn injuries in Sub Saharan Africa — an overview. Burns 2006;32:605–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Agbenorku P. Modernized standards in burns management: A comparative study in Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana. Burns 2013;39:990–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yates J, McKay M, Nicholson AJ. Patterns of scald injuries in children — has anything changed? IrishMed J 2011;104:263–5.Google Scholar
  34. Cronin KJ, Butler PE, McHugh M, Edwards G A 1-year prospective study of burns in an Irish paediatric burns unit. Burns 1996;22:221–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Serour F, Gorenstein A, Boaz M. Characteristics of thermal burns in children admitted to an Israeli pediatric surgical ward. Isr Med Assoc J 2008;10:282–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schricke DI, Jennings PA, Edgar DW, Harvey JG, Cleland HJ, Wood FM, et al. Scald burns in children aged 14 and younger in Australia and New Zealand-An analysis based on the Bi-National Burns Registry (BiNBR). Burns 2013;S0305–4179. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. burns.2013.05.010 [Last accessed on August 27,2013 ].Google Scholar
  37. Tyack ZF, Ziviani J. What influences the functional outcome of children at 6 months post-burn? Burns 2003;29:433–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Griffiths HR, Thornton KL, Clements CM, Burge TS, Kay AR, Young AE. The cost of a hot drink scald. Burns 2006;32:372–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Agbenorku P, Agbenorku M, Fiifi-Yankson PK. Paediatric burns mortality risk factors in a developing country’s tertiary burns intensive care unit. Int J Burns Trauma 2013;3:151–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Tarim A, Nural TZ, Yildirim S, Noyan T, Moray G, Haberal M. Epidemiology of pediatric burn injuries in Southern Turkey. J Burn Care Rehabil 2005;26:327–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Author 2013

Advertisement