Skip to main content

Why so little effort to study anti-oxidant therapy in burns?

Abstract

Given that oxidative stress is an inherent response to burn injury, it is puzzling as to why investigation into anti-oxidant therapy as an adjunct to burn treatment has been limited. Both the inflammatory response and the stress response to burn injury involve oxidative stress, and there has been some limited success in studies using gamma tocopherol and selenium to improve certain consequences of burns. Much remains to be done to investigate the number, doses and combinations of anti-oxidants, their efficacy, and limitations in improving defined outcomes after burn injury.

The publication by Adjepong et al. [1] points out that to date the literature contains 11 papers devoted to the efficacy of anti-oxidant therapy in wound healing in burn-injured people. This is surprising given that the pathophysiology of oxidative stress is inherent in the pathophysiologic response to burn injury. A recent review [2] discussed why burn injury gives rise to non-specific adaptive responses that lead to oxidative stress as well as reports of tissue-specific effects of oxidative stress on the bone, muscle, and neural tissue. Yet despite this knowledge, the frequency and severity of oxidative stress following burns are not documented nor is it agreed upon what actually constitutes anti-oxidant therapy, the correct dosages of anti-oxidants, or the timing of such treatment. The pharmacokinetics of anti-oxidants have not been reported in burns, so we lack basic information about the proper use of these agents nor do we know whether a single anti-oxidant is optimal treatment or whether a combination of anti-oxidants is required.

What we can do is to partially explain why oxidative stress occurs following burns and to mention the effects of oxidative stress on individual organ systems, focusing on the bone, muscle, and nerve tissue. The inevitability of oxidative stress comes from the observations that both the inflammatory response [2] and the glucocorticoid/stress response [2] to burn injury cause oxidative stress. While the mechanism by which inflammation and endogenous glucocorticoid production result in oxidative stress is not specified at present, in both the bone and muscle, these responses stimulate an up-regulation of the forkhead box O (FOXO) transcription factors. In the bone, an up-regulation of FOXO leads to its uptake by the nucleus and its binding to β catenin [3]. This prevents β catenin from participating in the Wnt signaling pathway that is critical to osteoblast differentiation and results in a reduction in bone formation [3]. Additionally, the up-regulation of FOXO factors results in a reduction of hydrogen peroxide in the mitochondria of osteoclast precursors resulting in a reduction in osteoclastogenesis and decreased bone resorption [4]. These data would then explain the hypodynamic bone observed in burn patients by the second week post-burn [5]. In the muscle, oxidative stress is associated with an up-regulation of FOXO transcription factors 1 and 3 which stimulate production of ubiquitin ligases, especially atrogin-1 and muscle ring finger protein 1 (MUrf1). These ligases break down the muscle, resulting in net muscle loss [6]. Moreover, glutathione S-transferase is also down-regulated in the muscles of thermally injured rats [7]. In neural tissue, there is an interaction between redox and autophagic pathways, such that the anti-oxidant lanthionine ketamine ethyl ester (LKE) improves some features of neurodegenerative disease [8].

Furthermore, some micronutrients considered to be anti-oxidants, such as zinc and copper, are lost following burns, by means of excessive excretion not only in urine but also by leakage from the burn wound [9]. Copper and zinc are critical components of the anti-oxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase, and stimulating this enzyme to function normally should be one of the objectives of anti-oxidant therapy. In one study by Berger’s laboratory [10], selenium losses were not excessive but intake was poor, leading to deficiencies.

Recently, attempts to treat the inhalation injury accompanying burns with the anti-oxidant vitamin E (γ tocopherol) in a sheep model have shown that a nebulized form of this compound can reduce oxidative stress and collagen deposition in airways following inhalation injury [11, 12], but we are still awaiting the results of any clinical trials in humans. The use of selenium in burns by Berger et al. [10] and others [13] has resulted in improved anti-oxidant status and more rapid wound healing. Thus, the proper use of anti-oxidants such as zinc, copper, selenium, and vitamin E could constitute the basis for developing a pharmacopeia of drugs used to combat oxidative stress in burned patients.

Conclusion

In summary, the area of anti-oxidant therapy to prevent or treat consequences of burn injury represents a virtually unexplored area that holds promise for effective adjunctive therapy if only we begin to study anti-oxidants in a systematic and collaborative manner.

References

  1. Adjepong M, Agbenorku P, Brown P, Oduro I. The role of anti-oxidant micronutrients on the recovery of burn patients: a systematic review. Burns Trauma. 2016;4. doi:10.1186/s41038-016-0044-x.

  2. Klein GL. The effect of glucocorticoids on bone and muscle. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2015;1:39–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iyer S, Ambrogini E, Bartell SM, Han L, Roberson PK, de Cabo R, et al. FOXOs attenuate bone formation by suppressing Wnt signaling. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:3409–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartell SM, Kim HN, Ambrogini E, Han L, Iyer S, Serra Ucer S, et al. FOXO proteins restrain osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption by attenuating H2O2 accumulation. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3773.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Klein GL, Bi LX, Sherrard DJ, Beavan SR, Ireland D, Compston JE, et al. Evidence supporting a role of glucocorticoids in the short-term bone loss in burned children. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:468–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alamdari N, Aversa Z, Castillero E, Gurav A, Petkova V, Tizio S, et al. Resveratrol prevents the dexamethasone-induced expression of muscle atrophy-related ubiquitin ligases atrogin-1 and MuRF1 in cultured myotubes through a SIRT1-dependent mechanism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;417:528–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Apidianakis Y, Que YA, Xu W, Tegos GP, Zimniak P, Hamblin MR, et al. Downregulation of glutathione S transferase α4 (hGSTA4) in the muscle of thermally injured patients is indicative of susceptibility to bacterial infection. FASEB J. 2011;26:730–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hensley K, Harris-White ME. Redox regulation of autophagy in healthy brain and neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;84:50–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Voruganti VS, Klein GL, Lu HX, Thomas S, Freeland-Graves JH, Herndon DN. Impaired zinc and copper status in children with burn injuries: need to reassess nutritional requirements. Burns. 2005;31:711–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berger MM, Soguel L, Shenkin A, Revelly JP, Pinget C, Baines M, et al. Influence of early antioxidant supplements on clinical evolution and organ function in critically ill cardiac surgery, major trauma, and subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Crit Care. 2008;12:R101. doi:10.1186/cc6981.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamamoto Y, Sousse LE, Enkhbaatar P, Kraft ER, Deyo DJ, Wright CL, et al. γ tocopherol nebulization decreases oxidative stress, arginase activity, and collagen deposition after burn and smoke inhalation in the ovine model. Shock. 2012;38:671–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamoto Y, Enkhbaatar P, Sousse LE, Sakurai H, Rehberg SW, Asmussen S, et al. Nebulization with γ tocopherol ameliorates acute lung injury after burn and smoke inhalation in the ovine model. Shock. 2012;37:408–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Goertz O, Haddad H, von der Lohe L, Lauer H, Hirsch T, Daigeler A, et al. Influence of ISDN, LNAME, and selenium on microcirculation, leucocyte endothelium interaction, and angiogenesis after frostbite. Burns. 2015;41:145–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon L. Klein.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klein, G.L. Why so little effort to study anti-oxidant therapy in burns?. Burn Trauma 4, 29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-016-0056-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-016-0056-6

Keywords