Skip to main content


  • Letter to Editor
  • Open Access

Management of fat embolism co-existing with thromboembolism may be challenging!

Burns & Trauma20142:20040206

  • Received: 30 March 2014
  • Accepted: 11 August 2014
  • Published:


  • Pulmonary Embolism
  • Venous Thromboembolism
  • Recruitment Maneuver
  • Compute Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography
  • Heparin Infusion

Dear Editor,

Fat embolism syndrome (FES) co-existing with venous thromboembolism is rare entity. It is a serious clinical disorder occurring after trauma, orthopedic procedures and rarely in non-traumatic patients.[1,2] We report one such case, which posed clinical dilemma in the management. A 20-year-old male patient was admitted to the hospital with bilateral closed fracture of the femur and bilateral both bone leg fractures following a road traffic injury. He was referred to our Center approximately 36 hours after the accident. On admission he was fully awake, obeying commands and hemodynamically stable. Electrocardiogram showed S1Q3T3 pattern, suggestive of pulmonary embolism. He was intubated and shifted for computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) that showed small thrombus in segmental branch of right pulmonary artery. He was put on heparin infusion and transferred to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In ICU, he was placed on Volume Control Ventilation mode with 100% FiO2. He was hemodynamically stable (BP-140/76 mm Hg) with tachycardia (pulse rate-140 beats/min). Three hours later, the patient became irritable, confused with a drop in sensorium. His oxygen saturation fell to 80% from the baseline value of 98%, increasing to 90% on 100% FiO2 with recruitment maneuver. The chest X-ray was normal. Arterial blood gas analysis showed PaO2 of 62 mmHg on 100% FiO2. By now the patient developed petechial rash all over his upper trunk including axillae [Figure 1]. Ophthalmic fundoscopy revealed retinal hemorrhages. Fat embolism was suspected based on clinical findings. Low tidal volume with high peep ventilation strategy was continued to maintain SpO2 within acceptable limits. Two days later, the patient’s chest X-ray showed diffuse fluffy infiltrate with PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 70. Blood investigations showed low platelet counts (70 × 103/µL) and hemoglobin (8.1%). CT head indicated features of cerebral edema. These findings further confirmed the diagnosis. Heparin Infusion was stopped. The patient’s condition improved remarkably over the next few days. He was tracheostomised early in the course of illness, later decannulated and 25 days later discharged from the ICU in healthy clinical condition.

Access this article online

Quick Response Code:


DOI: 10.4103/2321-3868.142396

Figure 1:
Figure 1:

Showing characteristic petechial rash of fat embolism over the chest and anterior abdomen.


Fat emboli typically manifest 24–72 h after initial insult. Affected patients presented with the classic triad of hypoxemia, neurological abnormality and petechial rash.[1,2] Fat embolism could be difficult to diagnose. There is no diagnostic test that is sensitive or specific for confirmation or exclusion. Imaging studies are most useful in diagnosis of FES. X-ray chest radiograph often shows increased pulmonary markings and flake like pulmonary shadow (snowstorm appearance).[3] CT study is insensitive while magnetic resonance imaging is the most sensitive technique in demonstrating cerebral changes of FES.

Pathology of FES is incompletely understood. FES might be due to direct effect of fat globules entering into the blood stream following tissue damage or alternatively production of fat intermediaries such as chylomicrons or lipids may play a role.

Treatment of fat embolism is only supportive.[4,5] Our case is unique as our patient developed FES in presence of venous thromboembolism diagnosed on CTPA. The management of FES becomes challenging due to the controversial role of heparin in potentiation of FES pathogenesis. Heparin activates lipase which increase free fatty acid and augment fat emboli production. Therefore, heparin was stopped as FES was more severe in comparison to peripheral segmental thrombi in pulmonary artery. Once the patient recovered from the FES, heparin was restarted for the existing pulmonary embolism.



Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Critical and Intensive Care, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India
Department of Anesthesia, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India


  1. George J, George R, Dixit R, Gupta RC, Gupta N. Fat embolism syndrome. Lung India 2013;30:47–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Mellor A, Soni N. Fat embolism. Anaesthesia 2001;56:145–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Shaikh N, Parchani A, Bhat V, Kattren MA. Fat embolism syndrome: Clinical and imaging considerations: Case report and review of literature. Indian J Crit Care Med 2008;12: 32–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Akhtar S. Fat embolism. Anesthesiol Clin 2009;27:533–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Habashi NM, Andrews PL, Scalea TM. Therapeutic aspects of fat embolism syndrome. Injury 2006;37 Suppl 4:S68–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Author 2014